Implementation of the Expanded Students Grant-in-Aid for Poverty Alleviation (ESGP-PA) Program in the Philippines

Jennifer M. Montero, Maria Lady Sol A. Suazo, Annie Y. Samarca, Minda B. Brigoli

Abstract


This study assessed the implementation of the Expanded Students Grants-in-Aid for Poverty Alleviation (ESGP-PA) Program as basis for policy enhancement. Quantitative descriptive design was employed in this study. Checklist was used in order to gather the data needed. To triangulate the responses of the respondents, random interview was done. The numerical data was subjected to descriptive statistic. The study found out that many of those belonging to the financially disadvantaged families were able to gain access to college. However, the grant does not necessarily propel the students towards increased academic achievements. On the part of the implementing SUC, administrative and academic schemes have been instigated in order to address the demands brought about by the swivel of enrolment and the needs of the respondent-grantees.


Keywords


academic outcomes, gains and impacts, grant-in-aid program

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alon, S. (2007). The influence of financial aid in leveling group differences in graduating from elite institutions. Economics of Education Review, 26(3), 296-311. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.01.003.

Deemer, S.A. (2004). Classroom goal orientation in high school classrooms: Revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments. Educational Research, 46(1): 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188042000178836

Dynarski, S. & Clayton, J.S. (2013). Financial aid policy: Lessons from research. The Future of Children, 3(1), 67-91. doi: 10.3386/w18710.

Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Woolner, P. & McCaughey, C. (2005). The impact of school environments: A literature review. The Center for Learning and Teaching. School of Education, Communication and Language Science. CFBT Research and Development. Available at ncl.

ac.uk/cflat/ab.

Jacob, B.A. & Ludwig, J. (2009). Improving educational outcomes for poor children. Focus. 26(2). NBER Working Paper No. 14550. In Changing Poverty, Changing Policies, Edited by Maria Cancian and Sheldon Danziger. New York: Russell Sag e Foundation Press. 266 - 300. doi:

3386/w14550.

Maskovsky, J. (2001). Afterword: Beyond the privatist consensus. In J. Goode, & J. Maskovsky (eds), The new poverty studies . New York: New York University Press.

Ockenden, L. (2014). Positive learning environments for indigenous children and young people. Resource sheet no. 33 produced by the Closing the Gap Clearinghouse. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/107b2cd9-88f7-4e8e-8ab3-33718c966ff9/ctgc-rs33.pdf.aspx?inline=true on September 2016.

OECD (2012). Equity and quality in Education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. OECD Publishing. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en on September 2016.

Lacour, M. & Tissington, L.D. (2011). The effects of poverty on academic achievement. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(7), 522-527. Available at http://www.academicjournals.org/article/article1379765941_Lacour%20and%20Tissington.pdf on June 2016.

Silfverberg, D.V. & Orbeta Jr, A.C. (2016). Review and assessment of the students grants-in-aid program for poverty alleviation (SGP-PA) and expanded SGP-PA. Discussion Paper Series No. 2016-19. Available at https://dirp3.pids.gov.ph/websitecms/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps1619_rev.pdf on August 2016.

Zandvleit, D.B. & Straker, L.M. (2001). Physical and psychosocial aspects of the learning environment in information technology rich classrooms. Ergonomics, 44(9), 838-857. doi:10.1080/00140130117116.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.